Le 2011-09-27 à 09:05, David LeBer a écrit :
>
> On 2011-09-27, at 8:57 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
>> So that it's bookmarkable and that search engine robots can index it?
>
> And so it's humanly readable and guessable.
And shorter to send over on Twitter.
> D
>
>>
>>> Why does Apple want to obscure their use of WebObjects with re-written URLs?
>>>
>>> richard palmer
>>>
>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cookies or, if you know you are using only HTML5 browsers, maybe local database storage. And don't assume there is no WO app based on the URL alone. Re-written URLs can hide a lot.
>>>>
>
>
> --
> David LeBer
> Codeferous Software
> 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing'
> site: http://codeferous.com
> blog: http://davidleber.net
> profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber
> twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld
> --
> Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group:
> http://tacow.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
