Re: Baby steps towards master-sync (Was: Re: Building Xquartz from source)

• Subject: Re: Baby steps towards master-sync (Was: Re: Building Xquartz from source)
• From: Nathan <email@hidden>
• Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:44:38 -0700
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=YswpAeOWsd8eRA7WqifUjZYPMGjHYWCbjBNDRhhSn9I=; b=WfVwIi5faQwJg28GoX5teFFBJ+bJ+OcApnUqC4c5rjEgnZBEJIeRmW8BjX5Jj2xmzzK9T0qdxJJHg7sH+WhEfGGtDspLlLRxqiQ0hHUxyyH+OzfxmmVWl+uxvGN5EAG5vWEMkwSekeSXwB6SQdvR7DS5DZXbwZr9xrMXi/XNvWA=
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LcKLUqQn1DVGRTxyLQBi08WtAhU8nWW4SITupRYlgBMHGCy5Xq2gbUjUL6/ZXAeUVAxGLLMAKIw4dTi9h6UY6bWaF8gl2xDgRhhxN/QH1FIqdwJuu3tY6Qr+W+EqSkwUbyxO+5NNWsWz5Aiv1at23fFR4V3OwFD15doxAf9W0KM=

On Nov 19, 2007 4:01 AM, Jeremy Huddleston <email@hidden> wrote:
> I'd like to start taking our base in baby steps forward along the
> master branch towards current, and I'd like to see if anyone has any
> complaints about that.  Here are the possible concerns with this and
> my responses:

No concerns here.  Sounds like a good plan.

~ Nathan
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list      (email@hidden)

This email sent to email@hidden

• Prev by Date: Re: The meaning(s) of $DISPLAY (was Re: Explanation of X implementations)
• Next by Date: Re: (OT) paths in Leopard
• Previous by thread: Baby steps towards master-sync (Was: Re: Building Xquartz from source)
• Next by thread: Re: Baby steps towards master-sync (Was: Re: Building Xquartz from source)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread