Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue



On Nov 25, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:

Had I wanted to switch Spaces, I would have moved the cursor out of the current Window to the desktop and then entered Ctrl-<numeric> to move to another Space.

Clearly, I have a preference for a "focus follows mouse" policy. Mac OS X is the only system that I have that still requires you to "select" a window to shift focus. As an aside, Microsoft did require me to purchase a resource kit to get the "focus follows mouse" policy.

There are good reasons not to allow focus-follows-mouse, particularly when you have a system-wide menu bar. Obviously, having an application steal focus on the way to the menu would be a bad thing! However, I will grant you that the Openbox window manager has a focusing delay, which makes the system wait a configurable time before giving focus to a window. This would solve the menu problem.


The window manager wm2 (which I've never used for more than 10 minutes) has a little manifesto on the main page (http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/wm2 ). Point 4 of this manifesto: "The click-to-focus versus focus-follows- pointer war is not really important. Most people can get used to either." While I used to disagree with the statement, my time with the Macintosh has convinced me that he is right. You get used to either, and it doesn't make much difference. Move then click, or just move... it doesn't amount to much difference in time.

With virtualization the rage, how do Fusion and Parallels get key events that might otherwise be diverted by the host operating system?

Is there a mechanism to "escape" a key event to indicate that I want the key event to go to the current window or to the host operating system?

In days of yore when I worked with the DEC System-10, it was possible for an application to put itself in an event chain and selectively handle events. Were the event not significant to the application, it would pass to the next application requesting the event or to the operating system.


I agree with this chain of command. The difference is that I think things like the window server and high-level applications like Spaces belong at the top of the chain. Hence, they will steal all of their keys from the stack.
--
Andrew J. Hesford <email@hidden>
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/x11-users/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: "Nathaniel Gray" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: Harald Hanche-Olsen <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: Merton Campbell Crockett <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: Harald Hanche-Olsen <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: Merton Campbell Crockett <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: "Andrew J. Hesford" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: Merton Campbell Crockett <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.