Both of your statements are like going to a mechanic, asking him to fix
your car, but telling him he's not allowed to open the hood or replace
any parts.
You may be able to use CodeWarrior - it can distinguish between <> and
"" includes if you set it up right.
On Aug 25, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Massimo Marino wrote:
I do not think you may install Xcode on UFS. If instead the suggestion
is to have a partition were to put source code would not work. Could
not tell OS X users to repartition their HD if they want to use Xcode.
It is supposed to work with C++ without the "caveat: watch how you
name your classes".
Renaming the code is also not a solution: it runs on Linux and
Windows. Asking to change MLOC to have it run on OS X and Xcode would
be just calling for killing OS X itself.
