I have been reading the documentation of GCC to see the caveats of
this compiler and I really wanted to start using GCC 4.0 because it
makes smaller code at faster compiling speeds. However, the docs
state that we SHOULD NOT use GCC 4.0 if we want to deploy on systems
earlier than Mac OS X 10.3.9. It is not said we CANNOT, only that we
SHOULDN'T. My question is: why shouldn't we?
When linking binaries, GCC 4 does two things very differently from 3.3:
1. GCC 4 links C++ code to a shared libstdc++ library; GCC 3.3 uses a
static library instead.
2. GCC 4 links all code to libmx; GCC 3.3 does not unless otherwise
requested.
#1 breaks the app on versions of Mac OS X prior to 10.3.9, which don't
have a dynamic C++ library. #2 breaks the app on versions of Mac OS X
prior to 10.3.0, which don't have libmx.
Is it possible to make static libstdc++ library from gcc sources and
link against this? Could this way work out? I've tried it but with no
success so far. I'd like to use gcc4 optimizations and also support
10.2 systems.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
