Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Linking in CW shared lib vs. Xcode framework




On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:04 PM, Jo Meder wrote:

Hi Fritz,

On 2/08/2006, at 11:24 AM, Fritz Anderson wrote:

There is a threshold issue here...

You're aware that Xcode can't produce CFM binaries?

Of course. I could have been clearer I guess, but I assumed most people would assume that the Xcode side of things was Mach-O. Too many assumptions, I apologise for that. I mentioned CFM because the app built with Codewarrior is CFM and not Mach-O ( which it could have been ), and I'm interested in the difference between what is happening with the CW/CFM shared lib and the Xcode/Mach-O framework. The reason the app is still CW/CFM after all this time is that we still support OS 9 for it. I'm now looking into building a Universal version for those with Intel machines, because our next product, which is already Universal, has been delayed.

What symbols exactly are coming up missing? Without the build log, this is incredibly difficult to diagnose.



Syd Polk email@hidden "Let the music be your light" - Dave Edwards, KUHF-FM, 1982


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: Linking in CW shared lib vs. Xcode framework (From: Jo Meder <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.