Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists
Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: crash in __static_initialization_and_destruction on 10.3.9 but not 10.4.4?

On Feb 7, 2006, at 4:46 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to prove here. #pragma CALL_ON_LOAD
et.al. are deprecated on Mac OS X 10.4, in favor of gcc's
__attribute__((constructor)) and __attribute__((destructor))
<http://developer.apple.com/releasenotes/DeveloperTools/dyld.html>.

C++ constructors and destructors work better in 10.4, and the problems with
c++ on 10.3.x and earlier were, I believe, one of the main reasons for the
rewrite of dyld.

I prefaced my response with the statement that my test apps were written with CW.

Regarding the usefulness of my post, the main point is that there are differences
in the way that bundles, dylibs and frameworks are loaded and unloaded, and
if one is assuming a certain behaviour it might be wise to printf/ trace the
actual behaviour and compare it with one's assumptions.


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: crash in __static_initialization_and_destruction on 10.3.9 but not 10.4.4? (From: "John C. Daub" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: crash in __static_initialization_and_destruction on 10.3.9 but not 10.4.4? (From: Gen Kiyooka <email@hidden>)
 >Re: crash in __static_initialization_and_destruction on 10.3.9 but not 10.4.4? (From: "Peter O'Gorman" <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.