On Nov 22, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Blair M. Burtan wrote:
If you don't care about code size (because you have tons of RAM
anyway) is
it better to use Fastest or Fastest, Smallest? Which produces
faster code?
I'll second what Mark said -- profile your code and go with what's
best. In general we've found that smaller code is faster, but when
you're very concerned with performance across the entire application
it's always best to run tests and measure things carefully.
Also, should you be using instruction scheduling for a Universal
Binary even
though there aren't any choices that pertain to Intel processors?
The default scheduling we use when compiling for Intel is optimal for
both Core and Core 2 systems, so you don't have to change anything here.
Hope this helps,
Eric
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
