[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why no -masm=intel with Darwin GCC?

Subject: Re: Why no -masm=intel with Darwin GCC?
From: Simon Connah <email@hidden>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:28:00 +0100
Delivered-to: email@hidden
Delivered-to: email@hidden
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Cc:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer; b=SY2hNsQjz+Fx8YK8Sx4yKweRLMC8xkNLtM68c5Ou6mDNiGD4N8a8TVABeUgoguCfIy6e5flusxGymYPIoZVRvAtBY4oydBPlfJ4zq0fHv/KZDAY5bSMoTT3C8qlmY/UdyPqIj82S9EerCfwpzzAM7qQZMdDhvLIO42IE2ypZQNE= ;

On 30 Jun 2008, at 08:13, Paul Russell wrote:

You could use the Intel ICC compiler instead of gcc - that will dump assembler output in Intel format.

Paul

Except you only get 30 days free with Intel compiler. After that you need to stump up some cash. As far as I am aware it is only free on Linux for open source software.

Simon.

"I disapprove of what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

References:
	>Why no -masm=intel with Darwin GCC? (From: Terry Simons <email@hidden>)
	>Re: Why no -masm=intel with Darwin GCC? (From: Simon Connah <email@hidden>)
	>Re: Why no -masm=intel with Darwin GCC? (From: Terry Simons <email@hidden>)
	>Re: Why no -masm=intel with Darwin GCC? (From: Paul Russell <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Re: objc_exception_throw
Next by Date: Re: XIB or NIB?
Previous by thread: Re: Why no -masm=intel with Darwin GCC?
Next by thread: Re: Why no -masm=intel with Darwin GCC?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home