Re: OT large integer constants

Subject: Re: OT large integer constants

Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 22:35:02 +0200

Delivered-to: email@hidden

On May 28, 2008, at 5:32 AM, Perry Winkel wrote:

well i use -arch ppc64 for that matter

Then it should have worked. At least it did for me.

maybe i switched a switch to many in the projectprefs :-)

i am planning to use gcc on mac, win, linux and stuff
i could go for C99, it will solve my error but may raise
an other???

Microsoft has stated that being C99 compliant is not something they're (ever?) going to do with visual studio. I don't ever program on or for windows so I don't have any advice for you in that regard. Gcc on both Mac OS X and Linux support C99. You have to pass -std=c99 but something like the ULL modifier seems to be a part of gcc's extensions for c89 (-std=gnu89 which is the default).

well the thing is that i am satisfied with a windows compile only, i explicitly do not want to use

any library of the Windows system. we only need very basic stuff like atomic operations, sockets and

database access

i heard that gcc runs on a windows machine also so i figure this will work

the thing is i want it to compile in the most-default-way and now i think

i will go for this

-std=gnu89

thank very much for that

--
Steve Checkoway

"Anyone who says that the solution is to educate the users
hasn't ever met an actual user." -- Bruce Schneier

met vriendelijke groeten

perry winkel

http://www.perry7.nl

http://www.myspace.com/dehufters

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/email@hidden This email sent to email@hidden

References:

>OT large integer constants (From: email@hidden)

>Re: OT large integer constants (From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>)