|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Jim
On Aug 31, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Jens Alfke wrote:
On Aug 31, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Jim Ingham wrote:
No it doesn't mean that. When Xcode is "running" without setting any breakpoints, there are a lot of the pieces of information gdb normally gathers that we know it doesn't need. So we cooked up some startup settings that tell gdb not to notice things like shared library loading and not to read any symbol information at all, etc. If you only need to use gdb as a program launcher not a debugger, it doesn't add much overhead. It's only when you want to do things like look at symbols or set breakpoints that you start to pay for having gdb around.
I think I understand now. So is this mode new in 3.2? I just tried running an app in Xcode 3.1 in the "Breakpoints disabled" mode, and there is no gdb process running at all.
So far Xcode is by far my top reason for wanting to upgrade to 10.6.
—Jens
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| >Xcode 3.2 -- Two more bugs?? (From: "McLaughlin, Michael P." <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Xcode 3.2 -- Two more bugs?? (From: Joar Wingfors <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Xcode 3.2 -- Two more bugs?? (From: Jim Ingham <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Xcode 3.2 -- Two more bugs?? (From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Xcode 3.2 -- Two more bugs?? (From: Jim Ingham <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Xcode 3.2 -- Two more bugs?? (From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>) |
| Home | Archives | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2011 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.