Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists
Image of Mac OS face in stamp
Re: Has anyone tried RAID 10 for metadata LUNs?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Has anyone tried RAID 10 for metadata LUNs?



On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:31 PM, John Hutchison <email@hidden> wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Ian Flemming wrote:
>
>> I'm curious if it would provide any noticeable performance improvement
>> to use 4 disks in RAID 10 configuration. We have some extra disks in
>> one Promise unit, so it's no big deal to use them. Any thoughts on
>> this from the experts?
>
> Depending on the sorts of files going into your volume and what it's tuned for (video, file server etc...)
> you can definitely improve performance by creating two RAID1 metadata LUNS across four disks.
> I have observed that in practice. Can't speak for RAID10.

Hi John,

Thanks for your input on this. Can you explain what you mean by two
RAID1 LUNs over four disks? I only need one metadata LUN, but I'm
trying to figure out whether the access time would be reduced by
striping two RAID1 LUNs together to form a single RAID 10 (0+1) LUN.
I've used this configuration for other applications (like internal Mac
Pro RAID) because it doubles r/w speed over a two disk mirror.

Cheers,
Ian
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xsan-Users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Has anyone tried RAID 10 for metadata LUNs? (From: Ian Flemming <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Has anyone tried RAID 10 for metadata LUNs? (From: John Hutchison <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2011 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.