• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: AFP Programming Question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AFP Programming Question


  • Subject: Re: AFP Programming Question
  • From: Nathan Duran <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:02:31 -0700


On Apr 21, 2008, at 1:48 AM, Quinn wrote:
In an ideal world, the docs would be perfect and the source wouldn't be necessary. This is not an ideal world. I regularly answer questions for folks who are creating AFP compatible products and need to clarify various issues. Those clarifications get folded into the AFP documentation, but that can take quite some time.

I was foolishly speaking out of the assumption that AFP support would have been deemed worthy of some attention considering how much of the Mac's advertised ease of use hinges upon its reliability, but now that I've taken some time to consider the official client's recent performance and look at the dates in the footers, you are correct; such idealism has no place in the new order and I cannot thank DTS enough for providing me with so many opportunities to learn this fact.


So would you finger the non-ideal documentation or the non-ideal testing matrices for the fact that 10.5's shipping AFP client is itself no longer a truly AFP compatible product? This list's 4th bullet in particular has sent more people back to 10.4 than I can keep track of, and I never quite know who to pass the blame on to when I have to spend hours downgrading clients au gratis because my Leopard recommendation ground their business to a screeching halt.

http://www.grouplogic.com/knowledge/index.cfm/fuseaction/view_Info/docID/289

Is the documentation so stale or the maintainers so detached and unreachable that even Apple engineers are filing DTS tickets to get answers? I thought that only happened with QuickTime, but things can always get worse I suppose.

At any rate, I take it back: The open source projects are probably better maintained than the official ones, and as an added bonus, the maintainers probably won't charge you a couple hundred a pop to answer questions about whatever they forgot to put in the documentation over the past two years.



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macnetworkprog mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: AFP Programming Question
      • From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>
References: 
 >AFP Programming Question (From: Dan Drews <email@hidden>)
 >Re: AFP Programming Question (From: Quinn <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: AFP Programming Question
  • Next by Date: Re: AFP Programming Question
  • Previous by thread: Re: AFP Programming Question
  • Next by thread: Re: AFP Programming Question
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread