Re: Re: alternative to .mac
Re: Re: alternative to .mac
- Subject: Re: Re: alternative to .mac
- From: email@hidden
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 23:13:42 EDT
On 7/24/02 21:05, email@hidden said:
>
Paul Richards wrote:
>
>
> Give me the option of @mac.com e-mail only service at a reasonable price
and
>
> I'll pay it gladly.
>
>
This is only sound and reasonable to many of us. The unfortunate fact
>
was that
>
the plan as developed and announced by Apple can be construed as not a
>
reasonable
>
option for the majority. While Apple may have thought of that fact
>
(that many
>
would not be happy), it still not a palatable one for the large
>
proportion of
>
iTools users.
Unfortunately, it is cheaper to do a one price scheme than to try to
track each activity separately. An annual fee should make it easier to do
that, but still requires a much more complicated database. The flat fee
is easier to run. I don't expect Apple to do more than perhaps give us
quarterly payments. (Don't really expect that.) Monthly payments and even
quarterly increases Apple's cost of handling substantially.
Personally I am still debating whether I will even renew for the first
year. I almost definitely won't go for a second year without some
additional services. But then that is my choice. I am not angry at Apple
for making a good business decision. It would be nice if they did
something for MUGs and their members, but I don't see it, as it would
once again create administrative headaches.
Lynn
InfoManager
_______________________________________________
augd mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/augd
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.