Re: AUGD: Are user group leaders being ethical?
Re: AUGD: Are user group leaders being ethical?
- Subject: Re: AUGD: Are user group leaders being ethical?
- From: Paul Richards <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:50:01 -0400
On Aug 20, 2009, at 1:59 AM, Deborah Shadovitz wrote:
It really irks me when people take a MUG position for the title or
power. Or get it and abuse it.
I am concerned that this thread is building on hearsay and possibly
incomplete information. In short, it seems to be turning into a bit of
a witch hunt.
There are only two people who know what occurred during the support
session in question, and we have only heard part of that third hand
from one side of it. Are we all so sure that it isn't a
misunderstanding? It is an older version of Office that is still
perfectly serviceable. If "accused" is no longer using that version,
has uninstalled it from his own equipment and did not use that license
as the basis of an upgrade, why couldn't he sell it to someone else
cheap? "Some initials" does not sound sinister to me in and of itself.
If the initials are something that concerned the person receiving the
software, did he question it? Do we know for certain that the
installer isn't in the process of notifying Microsoft of the transfer?
Do we know that the failure to transfer the disk isn't simply an
oversight? Have any of these concerns been brought up with the
"accused" at all?
Let's not get all crazed here.
Paul Richards
Ambassador
Syracuse Macintosh Users Group
Syracuse, NY, USA
http://www.iSMUG.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Augd mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden