Re: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
Re: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
- Subject: Re: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
- From: Steve Hirsch <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:29:35 -0500
- Thread-topic: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
Hi Roger,
I know I'm late on this thread but I thought to throw in my 2c. I am beta
testing the iO for GMB and I found that I prefer the accuracy of the iOne on
the iO table to the Spectrolino-Spectroscan. Who woulda thunk it? The 1/4
tones in my softproof profiles are cleaner and ramp more accurately in the
iO profile made using Profilemaker 5.05 beta than they do when using the
Spectroscan and version 5.03. There is less yellow cast contamination under
the same control environment. AND, it's blazingly fast. My vote's with the
iO!
Steve
On 11/1/05 7:47 PM, "Roger Breton" <email@hidden> wrote:
>> If you are looking for speed and still want the table format, consider the
>> iO.
>> I read an IT8 in 2 min 9 sec!
>>
>> Steve
>
> That's staggering. I don't suppose I could I have that kind of speed coupled
> with the Spectrolino legendary accuracy.
>
> Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
> http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
--
Steve Hirsch, Systems Manager
Hachette Filipacchi Media, U.S.
1633 Broadway
New York, NY 10019
212-767-6536
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden