Re: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
Re: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
- Subject: Re: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
- From: Paul Sherfield <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:22:53 +0000
Steve Hirsch wrote:
> I know I'm late on this thread but I thought to throw in my 2c. I am beta
> testing the iO for GMB and I found that I prefer the accuracy of the iOne on
> the iO table to the Spectrolino-Spectroscan. Who woulda thunk it? The 1/4
> tones in my softproof profiles are cleaner and ramp more accurately in the
> iO profile made using Profilemaker 5.05 beta than they do when using the
> Spectroscan and version 5.03. There is less yellow cast contamination under
> the same control environment. AND, it's blazingly fast. My vote's with the
> iO!
Hi
Is this improvement due to the iO or the PM 5.05 beta software?
Paul Sherfield
The Missing Horse Consultancy Ltd
Telephone: 01442 871752
Mobile: 07899 906385
http://www.missinghorsecons.co.uk
Apple Solutions Expert-Print & Publishing
This email and any attachments may be confidential and are intended solely
for the use of addressee. If you are not the intended recipient of this
message, any disclosure, copying or other distribution is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender and delete all copies from your system. Email may
be susceptible to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment.
We do not accept liability for any such corruption, interception or
amendment or the consequences thereof. We do not accept liability for any
action or inaction by the recipient as a result of advice or information
contained within this email.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden