Re: Making SWOP TR001 compliant proofs
Re: Making SWOP TR001 compliant proofs
- Subject: Re: Making SWOP TR001 compliant proofs
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 20:52:02 -0400
> I think you'd be starting down a difficult path to try this.
I'm thinking of simple visual experiments using Stiles 1955 CMF instead the
1931 2 degree CMF.
> You might
> want to begin by reading the thesis that Graeme Gill posted a link to
> in his last message.
Yes, thank you. I'll take a look at Shaw's thesis.
> The summary is that Mark Shaw determined that
> observer metamerism is much greater than any changes in the CMFs can
> fix
There wasn't talk of observer metamerism during the meeting last week. Let's
be clear about terms, by observer metamerism you mean the degree to which an
iindividual observer CMF deviate from the standard?
> and thus they are as good as they can be.
I did not get this at the meeting. This is like throwing the towel, Ken. Far
from some of the more vociferous participants in the audience.
> Let's face it, color
> science is full of inexact averages and compromises.
It seems that way.
> Ken
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden