Re: MultiProfiler question
Re: MultiProfiler question
- Subject: Re: MultiProfiler question
- From: Rich Wagner <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:38:15 -0700
On Jul 25, 2012, MARK SEGAL <email@hidden> wrote:
> Yes, useful test - but before doing it, if you have not done so already and if you think the nature of your previous results may call for it, I'd suggest running the images through the Develop Module using an RGB profile that roughly simulates high quality press printing, to see whether it may be worthwhile tweaking any of them a bit before sending. I think it helped in my case.
Mark,
What RGB profile "roughly simulates high quality offset printing (e.g., the "GRACoL2009" they refer to)?
Why not use Photoshop (even an older version) and the correct profile to soft-proof the images? If an image soft-proofs badly, fix it, re-import into LR and send it off... That seems better than trying to force LR to do something it's not designed to do (soft-proof CMYK). As for rendering intent, there's probably not a huge difference, and this is a crude check anyway, as the Blurb quality control is questionable to begin with. Using LR seems like trying to eat soup with a fork...
--Rich Wagner
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden