Re: Epson x900 & GMG issues
Re: Epson x900 & GMG issues
- Subject: Re: Epson x900 & GMG issues
- From: Mark Stegman <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:29:34 +1000
Intriguing that there is such a BIG difference in consumables and time. Annoying when others can do the same.
Mark
On 22/06/2012, at 10:06 AM, Martin Orpen <email@hidden> wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2012, at 00:21, Mark Stegman wrote:
>
>> One (obvious?) question - why do you want to use 8 colours instead of 10? It sounds like trying to fix something that isn't broken.
>
>
> That is a question that I've asked myself repeatedly over the last month…
>
> Running 8 colour, 720x720 bidirectional wasn't essential. It was something that I thought would be useful when a client needed plain CMYK contract proofs, fast.
>
> And a weekly 10 colour calibration takes at least 4x as long and uses more than twice as much media than 8 colour calibration -- so why not save both time and money by using 8 colour?
>
> It seemed like a good idea at the time but it has turned into a massively expensive nightmare :(
>
> But there's no turning back now. Once you discover that a piece of equipment that you've purchased isn't working as expected and that other people can achieve things with their identical equipment that you can't… what are you supposed to do?
>
> I may only drive during the day, but I'm not going to be happy if I buy a new car and find out six months later that the lights don't work!
>
> --
> Martin Orpen
> Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden