Re: In search of a D50 Editing colorspace
Re: In search of a D50 Editing colorspace
- Subject: Re: In search of a D50 Editing colorspace
- From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:49:19 -0700
On Sep 3, 2014, at 8:02 PM, Peter Miles <email@hidden> wrote:
> As far as I can see, the problems caused by Adobe doing this, …..
Lars may back me up for refute me but, I think that it’s important to recognize that Photoshop is, primarily, a relative-color tool and not an absolute-color tool. The types of continuous tone images that Photoshop is typically used to process are not single-color absolute-matching exercises.
That’s why, to me, it made sense that Adobe changed the behavior of abs col conversions from non-D50 working spaces. It’s more in line with what the mass majority of users of that type of tool expect. (and I don’t mean they dumbed it down, although that’s an argument)
The color science geek in me is a bit sad that it’s gone (made for a good demo sometimes). I also agree that unavailable rendering intents should be greyed out in working-space to working-space conversions.
But from a produce management & evolution perspective I think Adobe is probably making the right choices.
Which begs the question. Respectfully, are you making the right choice in using Photoshop for some of these color operations? Some of the things you are doing sound more like a job for Illustrator or perhaps a more specialized color tool.
regards,
Steve
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden