Re: pf in 10.4?
Re: pf in 10.4?
- Subject: Re: pf in 10.4?
- From: perdurabo <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:18:46 -0700
What exactly are you trying to do? You should be able to do most
anything you can do in pf with ipfw.
pf's advantage over ipfw (in my mind, anyways) is that the rules
syntax is quite a bit cleaner, pf is a little faster, and it has a few
leading edge features (like rules based on OS fingerprinting, etc).
Although I can truly sympathize with your plights, I'm not sure that
Justin is the one you should be venting to. Who that is at Apple, I'm
not sure, but.
~ per
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 12:45:57 -0700, OpenMacNews
<email@hidden> wrote:
>
i *am* a customer. direct/indirect purchasing control of ~2200 machines, including ~ 200 Macs.
>
>
i've had LENGTHY, repeated discussion about THIS issue with apple numerous times. sales, support, etc, etc.
>
>
nothing for ~ two years.
>
>
given that response, which is wholly within apple's right to choose/control ...
>
>
there's a really clean solution for *us*. we won't use the macs for anything that requires enterprise-class firewall/gateway functionality. and mention your sparkling attitude every time our apple sales person calls ...
>
>
duh.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
darwin-kernel mailing list | email@hidden
>
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-kernel
>
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
darwin-kernel mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-kernel
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.