Re: alternatives to signals like try/catch
Re: alternatives to signals like try/catch
- Subject: Re: alternatives to signals like try/catch
- From: "Daniel Walter" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 23:45:31 -0400
- Importance: Normal
> However, you can certainly arrange to have exceptions delivered to
your handler so that you can perform your own filtering. Your mistake is
in assuming that you want to handle signals, which are not the primary delivery
mechanism.
What is the primary delivery mechanism? I have
seen a reference to task_set_exception_ports somewhere, but have not found any real
documentation of it. Is this what you are talking about? Are signals
layered on top of this?
Daniel
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden