Re: [Fed-Talk] iPhone not allowed at NIH - comments?
Re: [Fed-Talk] iPhone not allowed at NIH - comments?
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] iPhone not allowed at NIH - comments?
- From: "William G. Cerniuk" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:59:26 -0400
Very true. And you are right, the corporate account activation is not
a technical issue from the AT&T side... They can be added to a corporate
V/R,
Wm. Cerniuk
Time is Short and the Water Rises
(sent via my iPhone)
On Oct 28, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Amanda Walker <email@hidden> wrote:
On Oct 28, 2007, at 9:28 AM, William G. Cerniuk wrote:
In some ways it is actually a superior security model.
In many ways, absolutely. I strongly prefer anything based on
standards (I should note here that I do carry an iPhone, and do not
carry a Blackberry).
I suspect that if Apple & ATT implemented the following features,
the iPhone would become a lot more enterprise- and federal-friendly:
- Bill to corporate account (right now, you cannot use iPhones on
corporate ATT accounts, only personal ones).
- Policy enforcement (freeze settings such as "auto-lock after n
minutes" and "require password")
- Over the air re-initialize, so that stolen/lost units can be
sanitized over the air.
The first is clearly artificial--ATT does corporate billing
already. The second is solely in Apple's court, while the third
would probably require work from both Apple and ATT. None of these
things require building an equivalent to BES.
--Amanda
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden