Re: Any head-to-head? (was Re: [Fed-Talk] Parallels Desktop 3.0 Build 5160 Released)
Re: Any head-to-head? (was Re: [Fed-Talk] Parallels Desktop 3.0 Build 5160 Released)
- Subject: Re: Any head-to-head? (was Re: [Fed-Talk] Parallels Desktop 3.0 Build 5160 Released)
- From: Brian Radwanski <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:20:27 -0400
The only thing I've so far seen was a comparison of performance
between vmware and paralles/ vs bootcamp when doing imaging with
encase. The mac did the image in 17 hours on bootcamp, 22 hours in
vmware, and 24 hours in parallels. In this case encase was not just
doing a block copy to disk image but i was also compressing that disk
image. I don't have the size of the disk image from the customer's
comparison but I could certainly get it.
Now obviously this isn't something that can be widely compared since
this use case is so specific but it does begin to show there must be
more efficiency in how vwmare is handling CPU intensive applications.
Kind Regards,
Brian Radwanski
Enterprise Systems Engineer
Federal Enterprise Sales
Apple Inc.
Email: email@hidden
Direct: 410-336-5230
On Sep 12, 2007, at 4:11 PM, David Hale wrote:
http://crave.cnet.com/8301-1_105-9760910-1.html
On Sep 12, 2007, at 4:02 PM, George Polich wrote:
I have seen — separately — various pros and cons for both
Parallels and VM Ware from people using one or the other.
Has there been any head-to-head, side-by-side competition /
testing done? Either commercial or private; with published or “on
request” results?
~~
George Polich
Army Public Affairs Center
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden