Re: [Fed-Talk] "User" v. "Consumer" v. "Enterprise"
Re: [Fed-Talk] "User" v. "Consumer" v. "Enterprise"
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] "User" v. "Consumer" v. "Enterprise"
- From: Boyd Fletcher <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:52:28 -0500
- Thread-topic: [Fed-Talk] "User" v. "Consumer" v. "Enterprise"
Title: Re: [Fed-Talk] "User" v. "Consumer" v. "Enterprise"
that’s why I use Entourage and not Apple’s apps. I think the “all-in-one” approach is far better and apparently so does most of the world since apps that use that UI approach are by far the dominant applications for email/ab/cal.
boyd
On 12/30/08 11:45 AM, "Joel Esler" <email@hidden> wrote:
I don't agree on this point. Just because they are 3 seperate apps, doesn't meant they aren't integrated. They work and talk with each other in real time, that's integration. If you mean "all in one app". Then there are apps like Entourage that do that. But I prefer to have 3 apps. Enterprise use too.
J
On Dec 30, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Boyd Fletcher allegedly wrote:
enterprise class apps, - Apple Mail/AB/iCal are still not integrated (MS proved back in 1998 that users prefer an integrated app!)
--
Joel Esler
http://www.joelesler.net
[m]
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden