Re: Iweb problem (was Re: [Fed-Talk] DOIM-Approved HTML program for Mac?)
Re: Iweb problem (was Re: [Fed-Talk] DOIM-Approved HTML program for Mac?)
- Subject: Re: Iweb problem (was Re: [Fed-Talk] DOIM-Approved HTML program for Mac?)
- From: "Villano, Paul Ch CIV USA TRADOC" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 07:50:36 -0500
- Priority: normal
Yes, makes sense. That's why they are in two different folders. What would make more sense is if Iweb recognized the two distinct folders as two different areas. The fact that it doesn't sounds like a Windows-like "feature" to me. :)
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: Joel Esler <email@hidden>
Date: Saturday, January 26, 2008 18:59
Subject: Re: Iweb problem (was Re: [Fed-Talk] DOIM-Approved HTML program for Mac?)
To: "Villano, Paul Ch CIV USA TRADOC" <email@hidden>
Cc: "email@hidden" <>
> iWeb saves everything in a file called domain. In order to create
> two
> sites you must have the two domain files in two different areas.
> Then
> when you want to edit one of those sites, double click on the
> domain
> file in order to open it. When you are done editing, publish
> however
> you publish, save the domain file, close iWeb. Then if you want to
>
> edit the other site, double click on its domain file.
>
> Make sense?
>
> --
> Joel Esler
> Sent from the iRoad.
>
> On Jan 26, 2008, at 6:33 PM, "Villano, Paul Ch CIV USA TRADOC"
> <email@hidden
> > wrote:
>
> > Thanks. Funny that you should mention Iweb. I am trying to
> build
> > sites with it (http://www.arielion.com and
> http://www.paulaboutlife.com
> > ) but Iweb keeps saving both sites in the same folder no matter
> what
> > I do. That is, when I work on one site, it saves both of them
> > anyway, and always in the same folder even though I don't tell it
> to
> > do that. This causes problems when I try to FTP the files either
>
> > through Cyberduck or my domain's FTP software. Every time I save
> a
> > site to a folder I must go back in and delete the site I don't
> want
> > from that folder, and sometimes delete the entire site from the
> > remote server, too, before uploading.
> >
> > Do you know of any fixes for this?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "William G. Cerniuk" <email@hidden>
> > Date: Saturday, January 26, 2008 17:36
> > Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] DOIM-Approved HTML program for Mac?
> > To: "Villano, Paul Ch CIV USA TRADOC" <email@hidden>
> >
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> Personally I don't even want MSOffice on my Mac, so I understand.
> >>
> >> In my opinion Adobe GoLive was a much more powerful product but
> >> when
> >> Adobe bought MacroMedia, that was the end of Adobe GoLive.
> >>
> >> As far as high end, no limits software, DreamWeaver is the only
> >> tool
> >> on the market. It is the Photoshop of we tools.
> >>
> >> I tend to use iWeb lately. It is fun and fast. I did not even
> >> reload
> >> Adobe CS 3 when I rebuilt last. ... I am also not the Army Homepage
> >>
> >> Manager any more be that duty change has a lot to do with my
> >> choices
> >> as of late.
> >>
> >> V/R
> >> -Wm.
> >>
> >> Time is Short and the Water Rises
> >>
> >> (Sent from my iPhone)
> >>
> >> On Jan 14, 2008, at 8:48 AM, "Villano, Paul Ch CIV USA TRADOC"
> >> <email@hidden
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> I actually use DW8 but thought there was something better for
> >> Mac.
> >>> Also, I have to dig up my disk, but do you know if they have both
> >>
> >>> the Mac and Windows version on the DW8 disk (when it was still
> >>> Macromedia) or would I have to buy a new version for Mac? Yes, I
> >>
> >>> have an Intel machine but I'm trying not to load MS software on
> >> it
> >>> yet. (I know, I'm strange. Heh-heh.)
> >>>
> >>> Paul
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "William G. Cerniuk" <email@hidden>
> >>> Date: Monday, January 14, 2008 6:56
> >>> Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] DOIM-Approved HTML program for Mac?
> >>> To: "Villano, Paul Ch CIV USA TRADOC" <email@hidden>
> >>> Cc: Fed Talk <email@hidden>
> >>>
> >>>> I always recommended either GoLive or Dreamweaver to the Army
> >>>> Homepage
> >>>> webmasters and worked to get rid of Frontpage.. Now that
> GoLive has
> >>>>
> >>>> been assimilated by Adobe, there is Adobe Dreamweaver for high
> end>>>> HTML work.
> >>>>
> >>>> As you note, MS FrontPage produces illegitimate HTML, not a tool
> >>>> for
> >>>> professionals... Or even rookies. Just bad.
> >>>>
> >>>> You might consider iWeb if you need a tool that is very fast to
> >>>> use,
> >>>> although limited compared to Dreamweaver.
> >>>>
> >>>> Rapidweaver is a rather nice tool with a very easy to use
> >>>> interface. A
> >>>> bit more complex than iWeb but not nearly as complex or
> capable as
> >>>> Dreamweaver.
> >>>>
> >>>> For hard core HTML text editing, BBEdit cannot be beat. Its
> >>>> freeware
> >>>> cousin TextWrangler is a an excellent tool as well. The former
> >>>> offers
> >>>> color coded HTML editing (parses your code). The latter can be
> used>>>>
> >>>> for HTML cleanup in the stated case.
> >>>>
> >>>> Over 50% of the sites out there don't need the complexity or the
> >>>> power
> >>>> of Dreamweaver. Elegant and sophisticated sites can be developed
> >>>> with
> >>>> the two latter tools more quickly and maintained more easily than
> >>>> Dreamweaver, usually with no HTML editing involved.. Unlike
> >>>> FrontPage,
> >>>> the aforementioned all produce great code.
> >>>>
> >>>> V/R
> >>>> -Wm.
> >>>>
> >>>> Time is Short and the Water Rises
> >>>>
> >>>> (Sent from my iPhone)
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jan 13, 2008, at 4:30 PM, "Villano, Paul Ch CIV USA TRADOC"
> >>>> <email@hidden
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Is there a DOIM-approved HTML program for Mac? I'd especially
> >>>> like
> >>>>> something that can clean up the MS BS. :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I made the mistake of installing the MS Office 04 for Mac today.
> >>>> I
> >>>>> don't know whether it's just a jinx with the name or what but it
> >>>>> gave me problems immediately and removal was a pain. My thought
> >>>> was
> >>>>> to just use Word for HTML docs since it had (in the Windows
> >>>>> versions, anyway) the clean up engine for crap code but I
> >>>> couldn't
> >>>>> find it in the Mac version and just ended up removing it (after
> >>>>> removing some hair from my head in the process).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Paul
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> From: "Shawn A. Geddis" <email@hidden>
> >>>>> Date: Saturday, January 12, 2008 16:49
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Leopard security config timeline?
> >>>>> To: Fed Talk <email@hidden>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Dec 17, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Amanda Walker wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Rex Sanders wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Anybody have any idea when the NSA/Apple security guidelines
> >> for>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Leopard
> >>>>>>>> will be released?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Many of us are independently writing STIGs once again. I
> hope>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>> won't see
> >>>>>>>> the long delays we saw for Tiger.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Solaris 10 has been out for over a year with no NSA
> guidelines>>>> yet.>>>
> >>>>>>> In past interactions with NSA, I learned to never depend on
> >>>>>>> estimates of timeliness, though DISA was sometimes a bit
> better.>>>>>> If
> >>>>>>> I needed a STIG now, though, I'd be writing one, stamping it
> >>>>>>> "interim" or something, and expecting to use it for a year or
> >>>> two...>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The Security Configuration Guides are the results of
> >> collaboration.>>>>
> >>>>>> Historically, that was between Apple and NSA, but now includes
> >>>>>> collaboration between all four groups: Apple, NSA, DISA, NIST.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Current timelines would make it available somewhere around the
> >> end>>>> of
> >>>>>> the quarter.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - Shawn
> >>>>>> _____________________________________________________
> >>>>>> Shawn Geddis Security Consulting Engineer Apple
> >>>>>> Enterpr
> >>>>>> ise
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> >>>>> Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
> >>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> talk/email@hidden>>>>>
> >>>>> This email sent to email@hidden
> >>>>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> > Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
> > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> >
> > This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden