[Fed-Talk] RE: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 5, Issue 48
[Fed-Talk] RE: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 5, Issue 48
- Subject: [Fed-Talk] RE: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 5, Issue 48
- From: Carlos Velazquez <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:15:39 -0400
- Importance: Normal
The problem with the pure cost argument is that it only collects the IT
costs.
The cost for the loss of productivity, capability, and others, is not
captured.
And to make it relevant to Macintosh, the problem is worst than the "Macs
are more expensive than PCs" argument...
----------------------------------------
>> On Mar 21, 2008, at 8:10 PM, William G. Cerniuk wrote:
>> History repeating itself. Bell bottoms, disco, command lines, file
>> extensions, mainframe like arch.
>Say what you will, but from a pure cost perspective centralized
>computing wins hands down--enough so that some of the functional
>disadvantages are outweighed. Recall that for the *vast* majority
>companies and organizations, IT is a cost center, not a revenue center. _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden