Re: [Fed-Talk] RE: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 5, Issue 48
Re: [Fed-Talk] RE: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 5, Issue 48
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] RE: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 5, Issue 48
- From: "Andrew Lambdin-Abraham" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:43:20 -0500
I would say that IT is no more a Cost Center than the DoD in general,
certainly when you look at them in terms of revenue... :-)
Andrew
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Carlos Velazquez <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> The problem with the pure cost argument is that it only collects the IT
> costs.
>
> The cost for the loss of productivity, capability, and others, is not
> captured.
>
> And to make it relevant to Macintosh, the problem is worst than the "Macs
> are more expensive than PCs" argument...
>
> ----------------------------------------
> >> On Mar 21, 2008, at 8:10 PM, William G. Cerniuk wrote:
>
> >> History repeating itself. Bell bottoms, disco, command lines, file
> >> extensions, mainframe like arch.
>
> >Say what you will, but from a pure cost perspective centralized
> >computing wins hands down--enough so that some of the functional
> >disadvantages are outweighed. Recall that for the *vast* majority
> >companies and organizations, IT is a cost center, not a revenue center. _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden