Is good to have both.
The Safari speed and OS integration is key; but as stated, for some web sites, firefox is not a preference but a necessity. V/R, Wm. Cerniuk 703.594.7616
(Sent faster from my iPhone 3G) On Jun 11, 2009, at 1:51 PM, James Alcasid < email@hidden> wrote:
We are putting Firefox and keeping Safar in our baseline image. If the code is not standards based then at least Firefox saves the day most of the time.
James AlcasÃd, ACSA | VeriSolv Technologies
Department of Veterans Affairs | Enterprise Infrastructure Engineering
From: Marko Kostyrko <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:34:26 -0400
To: skyman375 <email@hidden>
Cc: Fed Talk <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] AKO/DKO and Safari 4
On Jun 11, 2009, at 1:20 PM, skyman375 wrote:
> Right, which gets back to the discussion of, do you build a site to
> be standards compliant, or to meet the peculiarities of the
> predominant browser used to access it?
rhetorical ? sarcastic ? or for real.
... lowest common denominator for the "win".
Apple does a pretty good job of adopting the main standard, Microsoft
is terrible at it (but the standards bend around to meet them half way
so it kinda works).
Apple rocks, but ditch their predominant browser if you have to, and
the one you replace it with meets the compliance requirements for
those standards.
(is that what you were saying or hinting at ?)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
|