[Fed-Talk] RE: MACs are not authorized (UNCLASSIFIED)
[Fed-Talk] RE: MACs are not authorized (UNCLASSIFIED)
- Subject: [Fed-Talk] RE: MACs are not authorized (UNCLASSIFIED)
- From: "Dennis, Floyd B (IHS/HQ)" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:45:05 -0400
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Thread-topic: MACs are not authorized (UNCLASSIFIED)
When receiving communications like this, my response is usually something along these lines:
------
Please cite the specific security risks identified in relation to this operating platform.
------
The best way I've found to deal with suspected appeals to false authority is to ask them to identify the authority. I don't have a major problem with following regulations - but you better be able to tell me WHICH regulation.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Floyd Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: fed-talk-bounces+floyd.dennis=email@hidden [mailto:fed-talk-bounces+floyd.dennis=email@hidden] On Behalf Of Blankenship, Bob J Mr CTR US USA IMCOM
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 2:29 PM
To: email@hidden
Subject: [Fed-Talk] MACs are not authorized (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Is anyone else on Army networks running into this problem? Received the
message below about reconnecting some Macs we have to the network.
NETCOM DAA MACs are not authorized for use on the NIPR/SIPR due to
the security risk they pose.
Thanks
Bob Blankenship
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden