Re: [Fed-Talk] Comparing Macs to PCs by Microsoft Site
Re: [Fed-Talk] Comparing Macs to PCs by Microsoft Site
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Comparing Macs to PCs by Microsoft Site
- From: James Alcasid <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:54:04 -0400
- Thread-topic: [Fed-Talk] Comparing Macs to PCs by Microsoft Site
Mac OS X 10.0 was actually pretty bad, hence 10.1 a few months later. We
used Classic a lot back then and Mac OS 9.0.2 was faster on the same
hardware. Mac OS X in my book was not useable until 10.3.
On 8/11/10 10:45 AM, "Blackmon Jerry (Contractor)" <email@hidden>
wrote:
> Yup. You don't react to a threat if it's not worth your time.
>
> And this is, what, their third or fourth attempt at countering the Get a Mac
> campaign which has been shelved for a year or so now? Get it together MSFT.
>
> Apple's already eating your lunch:
> <http://www.electronista.com/articles/10/08/11/apple.high.end.pcs.thrive.in.ba
> ck.to.school.sales/>
> <http://www.electronista.com/articles/10/08/09/apple.making.huge.dent.in.stude
> nt.computer.sales/>
>
> This is a continuation of the trend we first started seeing in .edu when Mac
> OS X debuted. It accelerated with the iPod, and is clearly off the charts
> with the iPhone. What's it going to look like next year once the iPad has
> been revved?
>
> Apple's genius is in doing this in little itsy, bitsy pieces that individually
> weren't worthy of anyone's attention in Redmond. Poke a hole in the hull here
> and a hole in the hull there, little nicks Microsoft would never notice
> because they have Commanding Market Share, and pretty soon the boat starts to
> fill with water. You start bailing while you're taking even more nicks and
> before long, you're the new mainframe.
>
> --
> Jerry L. Blackmon II <email@hidden<mailto:email@hidden>>
>
> Senior Systems Administrator
> Open Technology Group (Contractor)
> OITO, Bureau of Engraving and Printing
>
> "The more I learn about computers, the more I like my pencil." -- Susan Katz
>
>
> On Aug 11, 2010, at 9:41 AM, James Alcasid wrote:
>
> Totally agree with kicking themselves. My opinion is that this is admission
> that Apple is becoming very competitive beyond just being highly influential
> to both Mac and PC customers.
>
>
> On 8/11/10 9:22 AM, "Joel Esler"
> <email@hidden<x-msg://28/email@hidden>> wrote:
>
> Yes, a few of their points are valid.
>
> However, the funniest ones to me were the "There might be incompatibilities."
>
> Not that there are but there might.
>
> MSFT, it's a stretch. MSFT would be doing so well if they'd quit kicking
> themselves in the teeth.
>
> J
>
> On Aug 11, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Kinch Antoine (Contractor) wrote:
>
> Hmph. Yes, some of the points are valid like: "Things just don't work the same
> way on Macs if you're used to a PC. For example, the mouse works differently.
> And many of the shortcuts you're familiar with don't work the same way on a
> Mac."
>
> C'mon son.
>
> But then under "Working hard" they #fail:
>
> "On a Mac, out of the box, you can only encrypt your home folder. With Windows
> 7 Ultimate, you can encrypt your entire hard drive and even USB drives. So
> your stuff can be safer wherever you go."
>
> Ergo FileVault circa 2005.
>
> Any true experienced Apple professional can break this article down 20 ways in
> 3 minutes. If you would like me to go on I can. Yes, Macs do not come with
> Blu-Ray or TV Tuner cards but in the new digital world, media is moving away
> from "moveable parts" etc READ: Flash Drives, and Solid State. From a
> manufacturing point of view it makes more sense, less parts to break, the less
> time you are without your machine. Oh, and the part about Macs not being able
> to use "touch" that is just down right insulting!
>
> Thank You,
>
> --
> Antoine K. Kinch <email@hidden<x-msg://28/email@hidden>>
>
> Senior Systems Administrator
> Open Technology Group (Contractor)
> OITO, Bureau of Engraving and Printing
> (202) 874-0932 office
>
> "Treat your password like your toothbrush. Don't let anybody else use it, and
> get a new one every six months." -- Clifford Stoll
>
>
>
>
> On 8/11/10 9:09 AM, "Kim, Andy (Gregg)"
> <email@hidden<x-msg://28/email@hidden>> wrote:
>
> Microsoft has launched a site
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/compare/pc-vs-mac.aspx) comparing
> Macs Vs PCs.
> Like it or not, some of their points are valid.
>
> What is your take on this ?
>
>
> Andy Kim
> Dir of I T
> U.S. Senator Judd Gregg
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Fed-talk mailing list
> (email@hidden<x-msg://28/email@hidden>)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden<x-msg://28/email@hidden>
>
> --
> Joel Esler
> http://www.joelesler.net<http://www.joelesler.net/>
>
>
> ________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Fed-talk mailing list
> (email@hidden<x-msg://28/email@hidden>)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden<x-msg://28/email@hidden>
>
>
> --
>
> James Alcasíd ACSP | VeriSolv Technologies
> Department of Veterans Affairs | Enterprise Infrastructure Engineering
> 470 L¹Enfant Plaza SW Suite 3100, Washington DC 20024
> Office (202) 245-4573, Mobile (202) 340-8930
>
> Note:
> This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential,
> proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or
> privilege is waived or lost if you are not the intended recipient. If you
> receive this message in error, immediately delete it and all copies of it from
> your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must
> not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any
> part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Any views
> expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the
> message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the
> views of any such entity.
>
> P Save Paper Do you really need to print this e-mail?
>
> 13:3
> ________________________________
>
>
> <ATT00001..txt>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
--
James Alcasíd ACSP | VeriSolv Technologies
Department of Veterans Affairs | Enterprise Infrastructure Engineering
470 L¹Enfant Plaza SW Suite 3100, Washington DC 20024
Office (202) 245-4573, Mobile (202) 340-8930
Note:
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost if you are not the intended
recipient. If you receive this message in error, immediately delete it and
all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify
the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the
intended recipient. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender
is authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity.
P Save Paper Do you really need to print this e-mail?
13:3
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden