Re: [Fed-Talk] Response to Higher over The "Apple Tracking" Headlines?
Re: [Fed-Talk] Response to Higher over The "Apple Tracking" Headlines?
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Response to Higher over The "Apple Tracking" Headlines?
- From: Dan Beatty <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:28:20 -0700
- Thread-topic: [Fed-Talk] Response to Higher over The "Apple Tracking" Headlines?
Greetings Lee,
I agree with you and Joel, that the way that statement was written makes it
sound like a conflict of interest axe grinding session. Since the same
flaw can be spotted on the other mobile devises, it seems clear that Apple
is not getting a fair treatment.
I thought the whole point of making a STIG included working with
manufactures to ensure both fairness and identify needs to be satisfied.
Oh well,
Dan
On 4/26/11 8:47 AM, "Rimar, Lee D Mr CTR USA USACE USA"
<email@hidden> wrote:
> PL> Are they talking about the lack of FIPS 140-2 certification or something
> more?
>
> Well, there's the rub. As Joel pointed out, "unmitigated risks" is kinda
> broad :)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden