Re: Bluetooth-dev Digest, Vol 7, Issue 13
site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: bluetooth-dev@lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=K48Bcih2ui65abaw6eH8wvaCG3BwNo0UeTrB7zbWX0w=; b=PE3qSXfRkOU4vAEplFDvYW4CXb6UNUqwqCwLB66crEWzWLy71Ou+xj8JmDQhuJQdR4 ZhrlKvAcLDdnjmIlys9q2A4XVYl5qB+VQCNtKWNmDEGeWHhIQRRe0C3hESxkvIDgJ9VN 9/Gfl2W7z3AneCxjiaFgLjzmw7f2BnAViEO10= Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=NdJI47OBaywdXdI9vvoL2BXwuJjNiIw7MYXMFQw97Q9RQi1IHPfnC309z5tRYRijO1 FiUrJ+RKDwAYe7gEXJCgwh/S50nQXRbEekduc05j+moaNNkImV7KMDut/n3XQ/o9qBXr D5I1grZX2bc49bun16RGGCVZkGvGZz9brt9P8=
Another question: all C functions in my SDK are marked as deprecated with a hint to use the Objective-C API. Is that documented somewhere? The examples at least use Objective-C, so I can guess my way around.
I reported a bug on this awhile ago (7278567, 7353935). It's particularly annoying because a lot of the C APIs don't have equivalent Objective-C counterparts. I think this change was documented in a some release notes, somewhere. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Bluetooth-dev mailing list (Bluetooth-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/bluetooth-dev/site_archiver%40lists.a... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com
participants (1)
-
Dave Keck