site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=teal.net; s=teal; h=received:x-smartermail-authenticated-as:received:from:message-id:content-type: mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to:references:x-mailer; bh=XGqxs0glGrkJ9aNUp1JbnXAMn1OqSsnFVtrS3j/dP3w=; b=M7jNMZIPjiuF89vZW8qJnQPEJuGsE7eEqfvcswNzoraEUEPlZL8CXe58pIGPS+5WvJZndwXkUrq7R 3eBhX9n0LOuIDjrUBrrC3wVqHsVpFxTFds0c3EtO0iX71CU9TymqXSGQctNTTJILJKMMk9K2HfkNdU trNOEettkNBRV5Es= On Jul 28, 2017, at 14:16 , Mark Allan <markjallan@gmail.com> wrote:
Reducing the frequency of NSXPC messages was a secondary goal to figuring out how often the main app ought to be updating the UI.
I’d be interested in knowing why you didn’t say that the other way round. Surely reducing the frequency of the XPC *progress* messages eliminates the need for the main app thread to do anything special? _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com