Andrew, DeviceLink support, really? I know it is a bit OT, but since you mentioned it, I want to chime in. Adobe's support is somewhat between "it sucks" and "non-existent". The DL conversion is obviously not via an ICC mechanism but und it works like a filter. That's the reason why they are unable to attach the correct device profile after conversion. And this is the reason why images look whacked after DL conversion in Photoshop. And this is why you destroy images permanently if you don't attach the correct profile manually but hit the save button, instead. It was Adobe who introduced the PSID (Profile Sequence Identifier) tag. And it's them who don't (and can't) use their own tag – nearly everybody else in the industry does. So far for DeviceLink support. Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Best regards, Karl Koch Sent from my iPad
Am 28.02.2015 um 04:31 schrieb Andrew Rodney <andrew@digitaldog.net>:
On Feb 27, 2015, at 8:17 PM, Don Hutcheson <don@hutchcolor.com> wrote:
For a company so vital to the ICC revolution, Adobe’s apparent inability to make good ICC profiles has always surprised me.
Their SWOPV2 didn't follow TR001 and thus produce a good profile for that output specification (at the time)?
In fact I can’t think of one new CMYK feature in Photoshop since the late ‘90s.
Device Link Profile support is one that comes to mind.
What CMYK features are needed?
Andrew Rodney http://www.digitaldog.net/ _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (Colorsync-users@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/basicc%40me.com
This email sent to basicc@me.com