6 Jun
2013
6 Jun
'13
1:32 p.m.
On Jun 6, 2013, at 2:22 AM, Graeme Gill <graeme2@argyllcms.com> wrote:
Yes, but that's not the point. The point is how you get to a perceptual pleasing result. Just because the end result isn't colorimetric, doesn't mean that it's a good idea to skip colorimetric as a first step.
That's not what I'm saying.....and I agree with you. My point was that there's maybe two factions, the "reproductionists" and the "artists" that are maybe talking past each other. I personally want accuracy (colorimetric) first....and at least with art reproduction, I pretty much know exactly how to determine that....but as soon as I stick my camera out a window, I've no clue how to determine accuracy in any meaningful or practical way. Terry