On Sep 30, 2019, at 8:31 AM, graxx@videotron.ca wrote: I still have an old SpectrascanT table, here, but I never used it for that purpose.
The T table! I keep a “PurpleLino” around for quite a while. I’ve enjoyed using Barbieri's for transmissive measurement as well but the workflow has always been a bit of a science project. The i1Pro3+ really bring its together for me with a relatively quick and easy process with results that are aligned nicely with what we're used to seeing from reflective processes. Once RIPs integrate XRIte’s i1Pro3+ API’s into their software, polarized measuremnts will really be an easy slam dunk.
The two gamuts you present at the beginning of the article are interesting and show that the "absolute" size (volume) of the gamut is less important than its "relative" size.
Yes, the general public needs to get a little smarter about not coming to false conclusions from these renderings, and especially from polarized measurements. It’s so important to make prints and study those both visually and colorimetricially before coming to any conclusions. Hopefully this sheds a little light on that. Scott Martin www.on-sight.com Precise color science for printmaking professionals