It sounded to me like sending profiles every week for a month might be taken as advice for others to follow when doing a remote profile. Henry Davis
On Jul 15, 2021, at 1:31 PM, Jon Meyer via colorsync-users <colorsync-users@lists.apple.com> wrote:
Andrew’s weekly audit is a scientific approach to validating print condition consistency.
Fail the audit? Forget remote profiling.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 15, 2021, at 12:39 PM, Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users <colorsync-users@lists.apple.com> wrote:
On Jul 15, 2021, at 10:33 AM, Henry Davis via colorsync-users <colorsync-users@lists.apple.com> wrote:
I understand and agree about a moving target but there are other moving parts such as the person driving the file. The same person drives the targets for a month and it’s stable. The job is sent and a different person drives that file differently - kaput.
Even a broken clock is right, twice a day.
A process, a print process is either consistent based on measured data or it isn’t. That’s all we remote profilers have to worry about before even thinking of profiling remotely.
Andrew Rodney http://www.digitaldog.net/ <http://www.digitaldog.net/> _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. colorsync-users mailing list (colorsync-users@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/jonmeyer%40grafixgea...
This email sent to jonmeyer@grafixgear.com
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. colorsync-users mailing list (colorsync-users@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/davishr%40bellsouth....
This email sent to davishr@bellsouth.net