"Because of the radically different primaries, matching print and display is almost never going to happen...and, indeed, considering the significant non-overlapping gamuts in either direction, often not something to be desired. On the other hand, in art reproduction, matching original to copy is almost always achievable (within gamut and texture and gloss and resolution limitations, of course)...if you know what you're doing...." Isn't it a contradiction?. Please explain to me what's the difference. What about designers working with Illustrator?. Don't they match what they see and the printed image?. I have been working for years with artist making reproduction of art with confidence. The artist give approval at the local or remotely because I keep the systems under control, again, with the due tools. Sorry if you can't see your copies match originals working in your display. I quit from this debate, Salud 2014-06-07 1:29 GMT+01:00 Ben Goren <ben@trumpetpower.com>:
On Jun 6, 2014, at 4:17 PM, José Ángel Bueno García <jbueno61@gmail.com> wrote:
Most of the users of the photography facilities have never seen a print (from an twelve inks inkjet printer) match a display, and I do that with low effort but with the necessary tools.
Because of the radically different primaries, matching print and display is almost never going to happen...and, indeed, considering the significant non-overlapping gamuts in either direction, often not something to be desired.
On the other hand, in art reproduction, matching original to copy is almost always achievable (within gamut and texture and gloss and resolution limitations, of course)...if you know what you're doing....
Cheers,
b&