Here's what I have... Curve2 version 2.3 session with 3 One run targets measured and imported into Curve2. In VPR I have selected "Run-1 Calibration" for Run (curves to be applied). Target data to be curved: I have one of the OneRun targets selected here. Curving method: "Curve Lab values (retains CMYK values and target type) Then clicked the "Curve & Export" button and save the curved data. How can I use this data in i1Profiler? When I try to load the data I get an error stating "Invalid CGATS measurement file". Anyone have any ideas how to get the data into i1Profiler to create a profile? -- Steve Miller Color Management Specialist "Quality Begins Here" BIC Advertising & Promotional Products 1000 3rd Ave. SW Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 Tel.: (1) 507 794 8203 E-mail: slmiller@norwood.com www.norwood.com / www.bicgraphic.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic message is confidential and may contain legally privileged information intended only for the use of the individual or company named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communications is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please immediately notify us by telephone, and return the original message to us at the address below. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: As provided for in Treasury regulations, advice (if any) relating to federal taxes that is contained in this communication (including attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the IRS Code or (2) promotion, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein: Norwood & BIC Graphic, 14421 Myerlake Circle, Clearwater, FL 33760. www.norwood.com / www.bicgraphic.com On 06/06/2013 8:32, "Terence Wyse" <wyseconsul@mac.com> wrote:
On Jun 6, 2013, at 2:22 AM, Graeme Gill <graeme2@argyllcms.com> wrote:
Yes, but that's not the point. The point is how you get to a perceptual pleasing result. Just because the end result isn't colorimetric, doesn't mean that it's a good idea to skip colorimetric as a first step.
That's not what I'm saying.....and I agree with you.
My point was that there's maybe two factions, the "reproductionists" and the "artists" that are maybe talking past each other. I personally want accuracy (colorimetric) first....and at least with art reproduction, I pretty much know exactly how to determine that....but as soon as I stick my camera out a window, I've no clue how to determine accuracy in any meaningful or practical way.
Terry
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (Colorsync-users@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/slmiller%40norwood .com
This email sent to slmiller@norwood.com