Hi Ernst, Using a measurement device with “even better repeatability” should create and “even better” profile, whether you are “iterating" or not. Keep in mind that this method of iterating is more like printing a “smart page 2” of your test chart. I don’t think this process explicitly requires a better instrument compared to the standard 1-shot method of creating a profile. In general, I would recommend buying the best spectro that you can afford (both in initial investment and in ongoing use) for your color critical applications. There’s a couple of things to think about when determining which measurement device you will use and repeatability is only 1 of them. FWIW, my tests were done with an iSis. Marc On Aug 28, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Ernst Dinkla wrote:
Would an iterative method on higher patch numbers like discussed here not require more consistent spectrometers than the usual category? Are the different opinions related to the use of different meters? With the assumption that the printer already delivers consistent targets for every step of the process.
-- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst
Dinkla Gallery Canvas Wrap Actions
| Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | Tel.040-2920132 Mob.0649426098 | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |