Is tetrahedral interpolation more involved, computationally? Best / Roger -----Original Message----- From: colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=videotron.ca@lists.apple.com [mailto:colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=videotron.ca@lists.apple.com] On Behalf Of Harold Boll Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 1:53 PM To: colorsync-users@lists.apple.com Subject: Re: Is there an HDM CMM for MacOS or Windows7-8?
From: Roger Breton <graxx@videotron.ca>
Using IDEAlliance's SWOP2006_Coated3v2 profile:
50 0 0 (ACE) 50.12 41.69 42.48 14.22
50 0 0 (PatchTool) 50.30 41.68 41.78 14.63
50 0 0 (Argyll) 50.29 41.68 41.78 14.22
Hi, Below is result from Matlab's Image Processing Toolbox CMM for profile SWOP2006_Coated3v2.icc using Absolute RI. addressing Lab value: [50 0 0] CMYK = 0.5030 0.4168 0.4181 0.1462 This CMM employs tetrahedral interpolation. Harold ------------------------------------------ "Keep it simple, but no simpler!" ------------------------------------------