I suspect that most great painters paint for one. If others happen to get it, all the better. You’re not alone. The PhDs in my circle seem to share the same, um, affliction. By comparison you must have a light case of it. Henry Davis
On Jan 13, 2020, at 7:47 PM, Rich Wagner via colorsync-users <colorsync-users@lists.apple.com> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 18:01:15 -0500, Henry Davis <davishr@bellsouth.net <mailto:davishr@bellsouth.net>> wrote:
I?m as happy to admit my ?broad? ignorance as much as you are happy to point it out. Did you gain a talent for being snarky during or after working on your PhD?
I’m sure during, although I’ve tried to extinguish that trait through the years. Grad school was in many ways like a shark tank, fed by the Dept. Chairman. ;-)
My apologies if I came off as snarky, Henry. I am personally ignorant about an enormous number of topics, but I’m always happy to learn (as long as the topic is of interest). I’ve learned a lot from many contributors to this List, and on occasion I try to pass along information that might be of interest to others. The very diverse backgrounds of contributors on this list is a real benefit, and I know there are many out there who “lurk and learn.” On the other hand, I don’t care much for the occasional MMA rounds.
So, speaking of tetrachromacy and counting colors, Concetta Antico claims she can resolve 100 million more colors than others.
https://concettaantico.com/#supervision
So what do her paintings look like to her? Does she pain to an audience of one, since almost no one else can see her work as she does? ;-)
—Rich