On Nov 7, 2011, at 3:31 PM, José Ángel Bueno García wrote:
Are accessible these documents?
As much as I would like to post the short articles in their entirety, copyright law prevents me from doing so - I can't afford the wrath of Wiley. It is unfortunate that Wiley does not reduce the cost of these articles for those not associated with institutions. There is definitely a need for "open-access" type publishing of academic research (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access), as even many institutions are choking over subscription costs. For the sake of completeness, there are two follow-up letters to the two articles that might be of interest. (3) Camera color analysis gamut Color Research & Application (February 2008), 33 (1), pg. 81-82 Robert W. G. Hunt; Michael R. Pointer http://resolver.scholarsportal.info/resolve/03612317/v33i0001/81_ccag Michael Brill has opened a valuable discussion about camera gamuts and Roy Berns has questioned the use of the word “gamut” in that proposal. We would like to stress the importance of associating a gamut with an imaging output device and would thus question the use of the concept proposed for assessing the capabilities of an input device. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 33, 81–82, 2008 (4) Try camera gamut again: Not for size, but for camera and profile evaluation Color Research & Application (February 2008), 33 (1), pg. 82-83 Michael Brill http://resolver.scholarsportal.info/resolve/03612317/v33i0001/82_tcganfbfcap... Hunt and Pointer call into question the utility of the camera color gamut (at least by my definition). Such doubt may be partly due to the connection of gamut with a size metric. Quite apart from gamut size, the sets that define my gamut definition are essential to the evaluation of digital cameras in conjunction with their profiles. The output‐device gamut; emphasized by Hunt and Pointer is also important, but appears at another stage of color management. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 33, 82–83, 2008 --Rich Wagner