13 Jul
2016
13 Jul
'16
11:39 p.m.
Hi all, does somebody know of a benchmark (speed, accuracy,…) and/or a feature comparison/limitations of current CMMs? For example ColorSync, Adobe CMM, littleCMS2, Argyll CMS, others…? Is ink purity preserving or multichannel support something that the CMMs offer out of the box or do these need to be implemented as a special features on top of the CMM as separate processing (by bypassing the CMM) or by extending the CMM capabilities? Or is this up to the creator of a device link profile and the CMM ‘dumbly’ applies the device link profile to the raster data without even thinking about it? If so, is this true for all CMMs mentioned above and how can I test this? Thanks Claudio