Hey Colorsyncers. I’ve been testing the i1Pro3+ and i1iO3 table in a variety of situations for a good while now. I have a review of XRite’s i1Pro3+ you can find at: http://www.on-sight.com/xrite-i1pro3-review/ <https://www.on-sight.com/?p=71755&preview=true> I think you’ll find it addresses of some of questions I would imagine this group has: 1) When should I consider making polarized measurements? 2) What print quality differences can I expect to see with profiles made from polarized M3 measurements? 3) What print quality differences can I expect to see with the new transmissive profiling mode? 4) What's different about i1Profiler’s transmissive profiling mode that we haven’t seen before? 5) How consistent will print quality be relative to other measurement modes? 6) How consistent will print quality be if I made some profiles with the i1Pro3+, some with an iSis, and others with an i1Pro2? I’ve included some color gamut renderings and, IMO, some really important dialog about interpreting such renderings. I’ve also included some M2 and M3 profiles of the same glossy canvas media that you can download and compare for yourself. Let me know if you have any thoughts or questions about the i1Pro3+ and i1iO3 Table. Scott Martin www.on-sight.com Precise color science for printmaking professionals