25 Mar
2013
25 Mar
'13
6:09 p.m.
On Mar 25, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Tyler Boley <tyler@tylerboley.com> wrote:
So my build settings that effect size make the difference.. two questions- What drawback can there be to making the smallest A to B tables? I can't soft proof with these profiles anyway.
Accuracy will suffer with fewer grid points/smaller tables. I've tested this.....table size seems to have a great impact than the number of patches used to build the profile.
What drawback can there be to excluding cxf data in the profile? I have all data relevant to the build saved elsewhere.
As long as you've saved the measurement data as an .mxf file within i1Profiler, shouldn't be a problem to exclude the cxf data. Regards, Terry