25 Mar
2016
25 Mar
'16
4:01 p.m.
On Mar 25, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Ben Goren <ben@trumpetpower.com> wrote:
ArgyllCMS is so far superior to anything and everything else out there
to what do you attribute this? it seems that cmm code for performing transformations must be very similar across most implementations; perhaps, all deriving from some common ancestor [seminal icc code?]: type & quality of profiles is what should make the difference [no?]. i’m amazed that cmm benchmarks do not exist [or, do they?]—in the way, e.g., engineers measure characteristics of other component types.