Derek, As an old time Pulse user who much preferred it back in the day to the old i1, who did several tests between my old Pulses and i1s and found their readings to be pretty much identical, and who was very disappointed also back in the day to see X-Rite drop the Pulse in favor of what I personally considered to be the much inferior i1, and who was finally very glad to see some of the much-missed features of the Pulse incorporated into the new i1 device... I'm curious in just what way you consider the Pulse is "inferior." Mike Adams Correct Color On Jun 25, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Derek Lambert wrote:
Yes. i1 technology was licensed to HP to be used in their printers like Z series. Hp was first on the market to include spectro in their printers. Epson copied this but they could not get i1 so the only choice was inferior Pulse spectro.
------ Sent from Apple touch-screen device
Best Regards,
Derek Lambert
Hi,
I believe the Epson SpectroProofer spectrophotometer is a Pulse device. Does anyone know why Epson did not use i1 technology?
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (Colorsync-users@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/typhoon%40correctcol...
This email sent to typhoon@correctcolor.org